Selected Projects
Client details are kept anonymous. These examples illustrate the types of problems I solve and the outcomes achieved.
The $40,000 System That Needed Three Apps to Turn On the Lights
Situation
A client had purchased a $40,000 smart home system through a well-known integration company. On paper, it looked impressive. Premium brands. Professional installation. Ongoing support contract.
Problem
The system required three different apps to control. Lights in one app. Climate in another. Shades in a third. His wife had given up trying to use it. When guests visited, he had to operate everything himself. The "smart" home had made their lives more complicated, not simpler.
Approach
I audited the entire installation and found the root cause. The integrator had selected components based on dealer margins, not interoperability. The "premium" devices were from three manufacturers who competed with each other and had no incentive to integrate well.
I designed a replacement system using a different hub that supported all three subsystems natively. Some existing devices could be retained. Others needed replacement with properly compatible alternatives.
Outcome
Total replacement cost: $11,000. The entire home now operates from a single app. His wife can control everything from her phone. Voice commands work reliably. The system actually disappears into their life instead of demanding constant attention.
Savings: $29,000 (compared to what the original integrator quoted to "upgrade" the system)
The Speaker That Didn't Exist
Situation
A client was building a home theater in an unusual space. The room had architectural constraints that made standard speaker placement impossible. Every high-end speaker that fit the acoustic requirements was too large for the physical space.
Problem
No off-the-shelf product met both requirements. The client had consulted three audio specialists who all recommended compromising either sound quality or aesthetics. Neither option was acceptable.
Approach
I contacted a speaker manufacturer in Shenzhen who produced drivers for several premium brands. Working from the acoustic specifications, we designed a custom enclosure that fit the physical constraints while using reference-grade components.
The factory produced a prototype in three weeks. After acoustic testing and one revision, they manufactured the final units.
Outcome
Four custom speakers delivered within 8 weeks. Total cost including shipping: $6,400. Comparable retail speakers (which wouldn't have fit) were priced at $12,000 per pair.
The client got exactly what he needed. Not a compromise. The actual solution.
Cost: $6,400 vs. $24,000 for retail alternatives that wouldn't have fit anyway
The New Build Where Technology Was an Afterthought
Situation
A client was six months into building a new home when they realized their architect had no plan for technology infrastructure. Electrical plans were finalized. Drywall was about to go up. Nobody had thought about network runs, speaker wire paths, or rack room locations.
Problem
Retrofitting technology infrastructure after construction costs 3 to 5 times more than doing it during the build. But the client's architect and contractor had no expertise in this area, and bringing in a traditional AV integrator at this stage meant expensive change orders and timeline delays.
Approach
I conducted an on-site review and created a complete technology infrastructure plan. Network topology. Conduit paths. Power requirements for a future equipment rack. Pre-wire for in-ceiling speakers in every major room. Structured cabling to support 10 gigabit networking throughout.
I worked directly with the electrical contractor to integrate the plan into their existing scope. No separate AV company needed during construction.
Outcome
Total infrastructure cost: $18,000 during construction. Estimated retrofit cost had they waited: $60,000+.
The home is now ready for any technology the client wants to add over the next decade. Every room has conduit to the central rack location. Adding a home theater or whole-home audio takes days, not months.
Infrastructure savings: $42,000+ by planning during construction instead of retrofitting later
The Smart Home That Doesn't Call Home
Situation
A client wanted comprehensive home automation but refused to accept cloud dependencies. Every voice command going to Amazon or Google servers. Every sensor state transmitted externally. Every light switch reporting to someone's database.
Problem
Most "smart home" products require cloud connectivity to function. The few that work locally are often inferior or incompatible with each other. Building a privacy-first system that actually works well requires deep knowledge of which components support local operation.
Approach
I designed a fully local system using Home Assistant as the central hub running on dedicated hardware. Voice control through Rhasspy (local speech processing, no cloud). Z-Wave and Zigbee devices selected specifically for local-only operation. A separate VLAN isolated all IoT devices from the main network.
Outcome
Complete home automation covering lighting, climate, security, and entertainment. Zero data transmitted to any external server. Voice commands processed entirely on premises. The system continues working even when internet service goes down.
The client has the same convenience as any mainstream smart home with none of the privacy compromises.